










|
REMARKS
BY RICHARD ARMITAGE
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE
U.S.
STATE DEPARTMENT
August
13, 2003
Excerpts
. . .
RICHARD ARMITAGE:
Of course,
the human infrastructure of Iraq is proving somewhat less resilient at
this point. And I suppose we shouldn't be surprised at that. Rogue regime
is a very catchy label, but I don't think any of us had an idea what it
really meant in practice. Murder, thievery, rape, brutality, torment:
these were the actual tools of governance and statecraft in the regime
of Saddam Hussein, for 35 years. Thirty-five years, three times longer
than Adolf Hitler ruled Germany. The distortion of Iraqi society has been
generational and profound, and fear in the heart of all Iraqis is deeply
embedded and it's going to take some time to recover and to rebuild, the
impatient eye of the TV camera notwithstanding.
I think it is fair
to say that the majority of Iraqis today want to press forward towards
a better future, but there are those hardcore Baathist elements, the foreign
fighters who have joined them who have a great deal of blood on their
hands. I suppose it is understandable that they are doing anything they
can to sabotage the process, to sabotage the progress. That this would
be at the expense of the Iraqi people should come as no surprise. Mass
graves we're finding across that country offer an extraordinarily powerful
witness to their lethal lack of concern for the lives of Iraqis.
But even with all
the troubling news that continues to seep out of Baghdad and out of Iraq,
there are encouraging changes on the ground, and Australia has done much
to make that happen. Certainly with the professionalism of your military
forces, but also through the ongoing service of numerous civilians, including
those who are providing key oversight of Iraq's Ministry of Agriculture.
More than 45 nations have offered cooperation or support for military
operations, including troops from more than a dozen nations who fought
alongside the Americans, the Australians and the British.
Today more than 30
nations are providing troops and assets for stabilization operations,
and most significantly to me of all when you look at this region, Japan
is looking into contributing assets to that effort. Thirty-six nations
have pledged or contributed reconstruction assistance, a number that counts
some $60 million from Australia and more than $100 million from Japan.
Now, I know that's a lot of numbers to throw at you. But they add up to
a situation in Iraq that is, in fact, stabilizing. Of course, there's
a difference yet to travel. There's no question the people of Iraq are
anxious to have their country back for themselves and to see it a better
place. Indeed, that is what every nation involved in this coalition wants
to see.
To date we have avoided
any humanitarian crisis or large movements or flows of refugees. There
is enough to eat, thanks to significant shipments of aid. And all of the
country's hospitals are now open. Twenty-two universities in Baghdad were
not only opened but completed their school year. The lights are going
on across Iraq. And we intend not only to bring power generation and water
quality back to pre-war levels as soon as possible, but to repair and
to upgrade those systems to the point that they are much better and much
more reliable than they have been in decades.
And while the new
Iraqi governing council is an important development, representative government
really has to grow at the local level. And so for us who are involved
in this in a day-to-day way, it's very encouraging that all the major
cities in Iraq now have city councils. Eighty-five percent of the towns
in Iraq have town councils. Iraqi police are beginning to patrol Iraqi
streets, and training has started for a new Iraqi army.
Indeed, if we look
back to historical precedent, these developments are happening in a fraction
of the time it took to reach comparable developments in Germany or Japan
after the Second World War. And, of course, those two nations had the
benefit of homogeneity in their society. They were not the polyglot that
makes up Iraq. So while I won't stand here and pretend to you that the
situation is perfect. There are obvious immediate security challenges
in some parts of the country and reconstruction shortfalls in other parts
of the country. But with this sort of cooperation of nations, there is
every reason to believe that Iraq will emerge from its season in hell
and that the lives of all Iraqis will improve dramatically.
Now, I don't want
to leave this podium without addressing something that has aroused a great
deal of concern here and in my country, and that is the fact that we have
not yet found enough evidence of Saddam Hussein's programs to develop
weapons of mass destruction. We will. I have absolute confidence about
that. Indeed, the fact that it has taken us this long to find the evidence
is a chilling reminder that these programs are far too easy to move, and
I believe far too easy to hide.
Consider, for example,
that UNSCOM was only able to confirm the existence of a biological warfare
program that Saddam Hussein claimed not to have after years of inspections,
because a high level defector walked in and gave them the evidence. Dr
David Kay was part of the original UN inspection team, and today he is
back in Iraq working for us, continuing the search. He's making solid
progress in finding the evidence of Saddam Hussein's WMD program. But
he's also finding that deception and concealment were an extensive and
embedded part of the program perfected over the course of two decades.
It's going to take some time to find not just the weapons, but the equipment
and the people and the materials that made up this program.
President Bush has
made it crystal clear that we don't intend to stay in Iraq any longer
than is necessary, but I will make it crystal clear to you today that
we are not going to leave until we find and destroy Iraq's capability
to produce biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. One thing is very
clear about Iraq, however, and that is that the world cannot afford to
keep coming back to this point. For 12 years the international community
could find no answer to a number of difficult challenges. How do we deal
with a sovereign state which is led by a criminal, one who has little
regard for his people, let alone for international law and international
order? And in particular, most particularly, how do we deal with the determination
of such a regime to acquire weapons of mass destruction? For us, just
as for Australia, war is never going to be the preferred answer. But in
the absence of any other solution, it will always have to be a consideration.
In the present environment,
the international community needs to come up with a workable, muscular
diplomatic answer to such unanswered challenges, and Asian states in this
regard have an important role to play to come up with these answers. In
no part is that clearer than in the question of North Korea. Again, as
our Australian friends know all too well, we're talking about a repressive
regime that is supporting itself in the main through criminal activities,
trade in weapons and drugs most particularly.
. . .
|