BRIEFING BY JACK STRAW
UK FOREIGN SECRETARY

UK FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

October 9, 2002

Excerpts

. . .

QUESTION: Mr Straw, is the return of the 602 unaccounted for a precondition of the return of the weapons inspectors to Iraq?

FOREIGN SECRETARY: It is not a precondition but it is an important matter which we wish to see resolved in any event. But there is a process. What we have to have is an engagement by the Iraqis about what has happened to those 602, and for sure we want to see an enforcement of those obligations in respect of Iraq. But what is the focus of the draft resolution which is currently being discussed informally amongst the Permanent Five members of the Security Council and the elected ten members of the Security Council, is about the obligations placed on Iraq to disarm themselves of their weapons of mass destruction and the need for the inspectors to go back, and the need too for the reintroduction of the inspectors to be backed by the threat, and maybe the reality, of the use of force.

QUESTION: What sort of reassurances have you been able to give to governments about the commitment to Iraq in the event that Saddam Hussein's regime should fall?

FOREIGN SECRETARY: The real focus of my discussions here, in Oman, in Cairo, and indeed in Paris early on Monday, as they will be later on today in Tehran, has been the readmission of the weapons inspectors and the enforcement of the will of the United Nations in that respect. So we have not discussed in detail the 'what if'. Because what we are seeking to do, a point spelt out by President Bush in his speech, is pose the Iraqi regime with a very, very clear choice – disarmament of weapons of mass destruction or the enforcement of the will of the international community by the use of force. We prefer the first. We want to see a peaceful solution to this. But are we committed long term to the stability of this region? Yes we are and that is in a sense above all why we are so insistent on seeing the will of the United Nations being enforced because the greatest threat that Saddam Hussein poses is to his neighbours in the region and to his own people.

QUESTION: You said that should Iraq fail to comply with the will of the international community then force would ensue. Have you had any commitments by any Arab countries, or any countries in the region, that might participate in such a move?

FOREIGN SECRETARY: I haven't been discussing the issue of military involvement. What I know, however, and my trip has reinforced this, is that there is not a single government in the whole of this region which is not fully aware of the evil nature of the Iraqi regime and wishes to see Saddam Hussein disarmed. And that conviction, which I knew to be true before I came, has been wholly reinforced by my visit to the region. And I just repeat again, here we are in Kuwait, a country with an honourable and peaceful history, invaded for no reason at all 12 years ago. I am going to Iran, a proud and important country, again the subject of a gratuitous invasion by the Saddam Hussein regime. And what has been the consequence of this? It has been that well over a million people in the region have died as a result of the brutality and megalomania of Saddam Hussein.