|
As of August 2006, Iraq Watch is no longer being updated.
Click here for more information. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
[First
page is blank except for the following notation:] "IX.1"
Applications
of
Nuclear Physics Atomic
Energy Agency Al-Qa'qa'
Facility Muthanna
Facility
Table
of Contents 1. Introduction
and Conclusions
Attachments: 1. Attachment
nr. 1: Details of the radiation experiment and preparation of the charge
1/105 Introduction
and Conclusions: The purpose of this report is to study the possibility
of using the vertical channels of the Tammuz reactor to irradiate quantities
of the raw materials of zirconium (containing zirconium, hafnium, uranium,
and iron in different proportions) --Attachment nr. 1-- to be used as
charges [of target material] in aerial bombs weighing approximately 1,000
KG each to give known weapons additional effectiveness by contaminating
the areas in which these bombs are used through spreading radioactive
material in a wide pattern in the air. In order
to define this effect and estimate the benefit of using it, a number of
experiments were performed and theoretical calculations were made — Attachment
nr. 2 . In addition, the necessary industrial facilities were established,
with complete cooperation between the Atomic Energy Agency and the Al-Qa'qa'
and Al-Muthanna Facilities of the Military Industrial Commission. We paid
special attention to safety considerations and to safeguarding the reactor,
since the operations diverged from traditional methods, and we took precautions
against the dangers of radiation to the people who handle the charge after
it is irradiated and until it is dropped on the enemy. Theoretical
calculations show that it is possible to irradiate a charge containing
2.4 KG of zirconium in some of the vertical columns in the reactor so
that the charge will have a biological effect during an irradiation period
ranging from 7 to 15 hours. After that, this quantity of zirconium was
actually irradiated. An attempt was made to manufacture a charge weighing
3 KG. Upon success, the irradiated material will be greater by the same
amount as when decision is made to make use of all the vertical channels
in the reactor. There are between 15 and 17 and the number can be expanded
up to 20 since some changes need to be made to the reactor reservoir.
It was confirmed through the experiment that the Al-Qa'qa' facility can
produce charges with the exact specifications, and the charges can be
put into the reactor channels without any great effect on the reactor
itself. Lead containers
were designed to transport the charge so there would be no ill effect
on the workers manufacturing the bomb during the Attachment
nr. 5 contains design specifications for the Qa'qa' 28 bomb. A series
of calculations was made to estimate the best circumstances for explosion,
to produce maximum effect in the explosion area. It was clear from these
tests that the optimum situation would be to produce an aerial explosion
at a height of 10 to 40 meters, since it would be expected that the irradiated
material would fall in an approximately 350-meter diameter circle, producing
a clear biological effect on anyone in the area during the explosion or
up to a week afterward. It was
evident from the experiment performed on the ground that there was an
acceptable congruence between the theoretical calculations and the actual
results. Calculated
estimates were made (Attachment nr. 2) on a number of the bombs effective
in a set target occupying 12 square kilometers. These calculations used Other
calculations were made to achieve the same injury rate with a wind speed
of 2 M/second. The results showed that there would be a need for 1670
charges, i. e. 84 irradiation batches at a rate of 1- 2 days per batch. To inflict
losses by external exposure to the falling irradiated material, our calculations
show that large numbers of charges are reeded to produce the same effect.
However, if we think of the second stage effects of Table A (nausea, other
symptoms), approximately 9 batches are needed. Closed
bombs will cause compound effects, some resulting from direct radiation
from the irradiated material falling to earth and others from the irradiated
material floating in the air. This material will enter the body through
the respiratory system and may also enter the digestive system through
polluted food or water, or enter the body through wounds. The overall
effect will be the total of all these things. Zirconium
was chosen as a charge because it is used primarily in bombs as an incendiary
material and therefore adds nothing new to ''the line of work". Zirconium
95 has a somewhat short half-life of 75.5 days, which helps to dissipate
the effect of the bomb after several weeks so that it is difficult to
track, analyze, or recognize it after that period. This gives sufficient
time for the desired biological effects to take place, especially when
there are multiple bombings. It would also be possible for our units to
go to the bombed area without great danger after this period has expired. The weapon
will weaken enemy units from the standpoint of health and inflict losses
that would be difficult to explain, possibly producing a psychological
effect. Suggested uses are:
Attachment
5 shows detailed schematics of the final design of the Al-Qa'qa' 28 bomb. The calculations
in Table nr. 1 of Attachment nr. 6 indicate that the zirconium is acceptable
in terms of the security of the reactor. The contents
of this report clearly show that the joint efforts of the Atomic Energy
Agency and the Military Industrial Commission have resulted in the capability
of manufacturing a bomb containing zirconium irradiated for a period of
12-24 hours. The bursting of this bomb will cause the usual effects of
the traditional bomb and will add a biological effect which will strike
the enemy in the first degree with regard to external exposure, and the
degree increases with internal exposure (inhalation). It is clear from
our calculations that hitting a point with 33 bombs will lead to the deaths
of all personnel within a ten-meter radius of the center, given normal
weather conditions. The cause of death will be exposure to radiation. The principal
limitations are: A. One
batch of 17 charges can be irradiated in a day. The radioactive strength/danger
lessens (cools) after 4 days. After that, it must be used in bombs and
dropped on a target without delay because the effectiveness of the irradiation
decreases with time. The period between irradiation and use cannot exceed
one week. Note that once the modifications to the reactor reservoir are
completed, it will be possible to irradiate 20 charges in each batch.
3. The biological effects of ionised radiation (Table A) Ionised radiation
has known biological effects on man, they are somatic when they appear
on a person exposed to radiation and genetic when they appear on future
generations. When the dose
to which a person has been exposed excedes a certain value rated as
O.1 sievert = 10 rem = 10 rad approximately then it is probable that
active effects of radiation will appear, this value depends on the nature
of the person exposed and the conditions of exposure, it is not likely
that clear effects would appear when the dosage is less than this value. Example of the
exposure referred to above are: -effects on the skin, breaking of the
lens of the eye, effects on bone marrow cells which cause blood disorders
and sterility problems. When the dosage
is more than this value then the effects are in co-relation to the amount
of the dosage, the more the dosage increases the more serious are the
effects. Here are physical
effects which appear afterwards such as cancer of the lung and luekemia
and certain
other malignant dieases. In the event of
low dosage with no defined rate of exposure, then the principle of protection
against radiation
is based on the fact that there is no safe dosage of radiation, and
that it is necesary to keep the rate of exposure to the minimum. Certain
examples have been given when the whole body has been exposed to dosage
at the following rates:- 100 rad = 1gray
and there will be nausea and vomitting, if the dosage is more then the
bone marrow
will be effected. Physical
effects are one of the important factors in war. Probable
ways of exposure Internal
exposure: As a consequence of inhalation and swallowing radioactive materials
and contamination of wounds. 3. Calculated
assessments. The container
of the radioactive material is pulverized and airborne which effectively
spreads its contents of Zirconium dependent upon wind speed and direction. We presume
that the explosion can take place in two instances, the first on the earth's
surface and the second 30 metres above the surface of the earth. Attachment Nr. 2 gives details of the calculated assessments to bring about the required effects.
TABLE
A 1 sievert
= 100 rems = 100 rads (approximately)
Examples 1becquerel
= 27.03 x 10^-12 curies = 27.03
x 10^-6 micro-curies 200 micro-curies/cubic
metre = 200/ 27.3 x 10^-6 becquerel/cubic metre =7.4
x 10^6 becquerel/cubic metre lf we
know that the amount a normal man breathes = 1.3 cubic metre/hour The amount
of radiation inhaled in a day =7.4 x 10^6 x 28.8
= 213.12
x 10^6 becquerel/day •
Dosage = 4.09 x 10^-9 x 213.12 x 10^6 = 871.66
x l0^-3 sievert/day = 0.871
sievert/day We have
learnt that the rate of radioactivity of a radioactive charge is 10% after
the first week after the period of radiation has ended and in the case
of the fourth week after the radiation the radioactivity will have reduced
by about 30% of the initial levels. 4. The
radioactive effectiveness of the charge.
A sample
has been prepared to test the actual explosion in the first place and
to observe qualities of the physical values during radiation. 1. Weight
of the sample 2.400 grammes [sic] After
irradiation the sample was introduced to the hot cells for study, its
physical condition was very good it was then placed into a lead container. On Sat
22/8/1987 the level of radiation to the irradiated sample was
measured from outside the lead container by touch and from various distances
from the end of sample as shown in the diagram. The
diagram shows the variations in the radioactive dosage in the sample,
as there are 0.1 milli roentgen/hour opposite the top part of the sample,
it then rises gradually as we approach the lower part 0.1 mR/hr Note. The details
of this test are given in attachment (1) The field
tests aimed for the following:-
This test was carried out in al-Haswa range on Tuesday 18/8/1987, to
check whether it was possible to smash the lead cover of an irradiated
charge. The test succeeded
and the blast wave was very strong and the radius of its noted effect
was more than 300 metres, and from a test the establishment carried
out it was considered that the blast's killing effect was 200 metres
from the centre of the explosion. b. The
second test (attachment Nr 2)
This test was carried out in the Western Desert on Thursday 27/8/1987.
This test aimed mainly to find out how irradiated matter spread. This test also
included the preparation of the bomb and its delivery to the proposed
location and then to carry out field reconnaisance of the area. The operation demanded
personal protective material to ensure the safety of the personnel measuring
the level of radiation after the explosion, the wind speed was very
high when the test was carried out - more than 8 metres/second. Levels
of radiation were measured directly after the test, and rings of radiation
were established around the site of the explosion and a programme was
started for the contaminated earth. Immediate readings
showed that the level of radiation near the site of the explosion was
more than the permitted limit for personnel operating in the radiation
fields, also the results of the soil analysis indicated that it was
290 times that allowed for foodstuffs. It was, however,
not possible to measure the airborne part of the cloud which the wind
took a long way. This was because there was basically very little irradiated
material. c. The
third field test (attachment Nr 4) This test was carried out in the Western Desert (aircraft firing range)
on Monday 14/12/1987. This test aimed
to check the suitability of this weapon for use by aircraft and this
was done in two stages. The first was the firing of a [possibly "projectile"]
to check on the detonation mechanism and the second the actuality of
there being a radioactive charge and using timed fuses to explode it
on the surface. Aircraft payload
was one bomb in every case. The cloud from
the explosion rose more than 30 metres above the surface of the earth
it was then dispersed by the wind, wind strength was in the region of
2 metres per second. The particles falling down near the centre of the
explosion indicated that the two bombs had fallen within 15 metres of
each other and the increased level of radiation began as we were still
approaching the centre of the explosion at a distance of more than 80
metres. The highest levels
of radiation showed that, at a distance of some 10 metres from the centre,
they were in excess of 3 milli rad/hour, this is the highest permissable
level for those operating in radioactive fields. The radioactivity
on the contaminated soil, however, reached (7297) which is more than
the maximum permissable for food. The methods of
calculation referred to in attachment (2) are unmeasured assessments
for which there is no previous parallel and it differs from known estimates
for cases of the spreading of radiation after nuclear explosions. One of the assumptions
pointed to the possibility of death occuring after two weeks for people
inhaling irradiated material for two minutes and carried by (710) charges
if the wind speed was one metre per second, on the assumption that they
are within an area measuring 12 square kilometres, but there is a probability
that 100% of personnel 150 metres from the target would die if 23 bombs
fell on the target. The incidence of
casualties as a result of external exposure requires a large number
of charges on the target, the amount required is as high as 8330 charges. The difference
between the two incances is attributable to the requirements for external
exposure being greater than those for internal exposure, one must consider
both of the effects on the enemy. Attachment
Nr. 7 refers to the opinion of Air Force Command concerning the success
of loading and dropping the bombs with certain proposals concerning their
requirements. 6. Preparations
for formal production The preparation
for production is formal in the reactor, but in order to check on the
maximum capabilities for full exploitation of the vertical tubes in the
reactor (there are 20) calculations were made which indicate that the
operation to irradiate 20 tubes in the heart of the reactor does not pose
any danger because of the reaction or the temperature. Certain
modifications were also carried out on the reactor tank, and some cages
were made out of special aluminium for cooling in the tank, and vertical
tubes and lead containers to receive the irradiated charges. Then the
charges are actually irradiated and taken out from the tank of the reactor
straight into the lead containers once, securely to the loading place
in complete secrecy. According
to our estimates this test will take two weeks; then it will be possible
to give a full and definitive description of all the operations. ATTACHMENT
A Details
of the irradiation tests and adjustments to the charge. The
test The
production stages and sample inspection foltow:- a. The
container was made from three separate bits of pure aluminium as in diagram
(1).
• Middle of the sample at a distance of 30 cm from the lower end Tc-l. 2. Inspection and
change A number
of inspections were carried out on the sample to check firstly whether
the welding was safe and secondly to check the effect of the gases as
follows:
3. The
irradiation The irradiation
operation was carried out after checking all the inspections and conducting
discussions about safety procedures and taking into consideration all
the observations which had arisen about the temperature and to ensure
that they did not effect the safety of the core of the reactor. A. The
safety measures taken during the irradiation were as follows:
It was
decided to raise the temperature of the reactor gradually, and table 1
shows the temperatures for all the thermo couples fixed on the surface. The relationship-between
the power of the reactor and the temperature at the core of the reactor
Tc-2 was drawn and and the mean value appeared as a straight line. y=
27.9 + 6.6x x = power
of reactor 5 MW The attached
temperature calculations were used as a guide to the safety of the irradiation. All probabilities
were discussed concerning the safety requirements and in particular concerning
the specifications for manufacture of the sample and what could happen
when the temperature was raised. 3. After
cooling the sample and removing the Gamma rays which had been caused by
the aluminium element and in particular the Sodium 24 which had been released
by it; the sample was extracted and placed into the lead container which
had been prepared for it. The temperature
readings outside the lead container were as given in diagram 1, which
shows they were within the permited limits for the transfer when done
with contact on the surface, and were much less than the permitted levels
for secure transfer. Measurements
were also taken on the sample without lead shields and in contact and
the results showed up the same as the measurements outside the container,
they started from 2 Rad/hour and rose to 25 Rad/hour near the last third
then fell to 2.5 Rad/hour at the other end.
TABLE
NR 1
Four type
(K.) thermo couples attached to a cylindrical pipe were measured. They
were measured inside the thermal furnace containing powdered oxide of
aluminium and at temperatures ranging from 35 deg C to 130 deg C and the
readings of the thermo couples differed from 2 to 3 deg C less than the
readings of the furnace. This was more in the report on the temperatures
of the four thermo couples by the recording equipment belonging to the
laboratory . Note that
the four thermo couples were attached to the metal cylinder at various
distances which will cause differences in their various temperatures. Diagram
1 Diagram
2
Temperature
calculations for irradiation of material ZrO in reactor 14 July. The irradiation
of the sample of ZrO in tube 16 shows the temperature distribution, the
temperature of the cover reaches 84 deg C, whilst the irradiation of the
same sample in tube 20 registered a temperature of 57 deg C for the cover. Observations Diagram
3: Diagram
4: Cross
section showing the distribution of temperatures in the iradiated sample
in tube 16 if there is a gap of air [figures not visible] mm thick. Diagram
5: Cross
section showing distribution of temperatures in the irradiated sample
in tube 16 if there is a gap of air 0.5 mm thick. Diagram
6 Rate
of dosage [base-line]
Distances from the source Irradiation
of sample of ZrO2 Introduction
1 The
maximum temperature inside the sample must not excede melting point. Methods
for calculation. The values
of the radiation statistics in the vertical tubes registered in report
"6210/P16?86" and based on the results of practical measurements
and the calculations of the temperature were carried out in tube Nr. 16
bearing in mind that the highest radiation statistics values were recorded
in this tube. The value
of the power generated inside the irradiated sample and its container
as a result of the radiation statistics were calculated. The temperature
loss across the part of the system were then calculated and listed in
diagram 1. Temperature
loss via the irradiated sample. DeltaT=
9'"Ri^2 9"'
is the power generated in the sample for a unit of size:- Ri is
the radius of the sample (M) The temperature
loss across the air was measured, but this was a very poor conductor as
in the following examples:- 9
.
as h =
k/t the rate of temperature conducted across a layer of water using natural
conductors to move the heat. Calculating
the rate of transfer of heat between the surface of the third container
and the tank of the reactor as follows: 0.33 Nu = 0.12
(Ra * Pr) Ra=g *
B^2 *(-c - ta) * L^3/M^3 Pr
= cp * M/K When g =
The first transfer The temperature
of the water in the reactor tank was approximately 40 [possibly deg C]
and was used to find the temperature of the other parts. [remainder
of page blank except for the following typed in English at the bottom
of the page] *WILLIAM
H. McADAMS "HEAT TRANSMISSION"
1. The presence of a layer of air (air is a poor conductor of heat)
leads to a great reduction in the temperature across the air at the
higher temperatures inside the sample and may lead to melting of the
sample's container (this is important) Results Taking
the temperature of the water in the reactor tank to be 40 deg C A. When there is a layer of air
B. Replacing
the layer of air with one of water
These
temperatures will cause the water to boil and vapourise 2. The
same calculations as before in vertical channel 20 A. Using
a layer of air
B. Using
a layer of water
Diagram
8 Diagram
9 Diagram
9 Attachment
NR 2
1. External
exposure to Gamma rays "exposure
rate (R/h) = 6 x C (Curie) x E(Me V) Taking
that the source is a radioactive point ranging in power from 0.07 to 4
million electron volts, or a more accurate way of calculating the rate
of dosage is to use the constant of Gamma :- D ( R/h
= (Rhm/Ci) A(Ci)
2 Internal
exposure (inhalation)
3. Calculations
for the concentrations of air inhaled We note
from table 2 that in average conditions the highest concentration is 38
Micro curies per cubic metrc at a distance of 590 metres from the centre
of the explosion. The highest
level permissable for bodily damage ''MPBB" for Zirconium
= 20 Milli curies 3 x 10
Milli curies per cubic cm = 3x10^-2
Milli curies per cubic metre This number
scientifically represents the limit which it is not pemissable to excede
for workers in the radioactive
fields on health grounds . 4. What
is needed for internal exposure by inhalation a. First
method What is
required is the sievert dosage of the fourth stage in table O page 4 which
causes death after two weeks = 200 Rems for the period of one minute in
the air The dosage
suffered = average amount of air inhaled x effectiveness of the matter
x conversion factor (becquerel)
effectiveness = when
1 Sievert = 27.02 x 10^-12 Curie = _______3_________
= 24.45
x 10^9 x 27 x 10^-12 =
660 x 10^-3 =
0.66 Curies per cubic metre will cause the fourth stage for every minute When the
one charge = 390 milli curies/Kgm The one
charge (0.936/0.66) = 1.42 metres for the occurrence of fourth stage casualties
per one cubic
metre per one minute 6000
= 100 minutes to cover the distance To get
the required concentration on the path of 6 Km we need .100 = 70.42 We assume
that one bomb after exploding will adopt a conical path and the conical
paths for a number of bombs exploding on one line will blend into each
other when the distance between one and another is 200 metres on the width
of a target of 2 Km This means
that the number required is (2000/200) = 10 one [comment:- possibly means
units] to cover
the width of the target. lf the
total number required is = 10 x 71= 710charges (710)
charges equals (71/20) = 35.5 = 36 loads
of radiation at the rate of 20 charges per batch. b.
Second method Table
Nr A, settled conditions at a distance of 300 metres from the centre of
the explosion, wind speed 1 m/sec the concentration equals 5100 micro
curies/cubic metre. = 370
x 10^-6 Curies/cubic metre = 370 x 10^-6 x 3.7 x 10^10 becquerel/cubic
metre = 1369
x 10^4 becquerel/cubic metre Rate of
human inhalation = 1.2 cubic metres/hour Using
the calculations given in Table A it is possible to select the most favourable
and ideal atmospheric conditions and distances to achieve the optimum
effects. It clearly
appears that when the bomb is exploded on the surface then the radioactive
concentration at a distance of 150 metres from the center of the explosion
when the wind speed is 2 m/sec is 20,000 micro curies/cubic metre but
this concentration reduces as we move away from the centre. 20 x 10^3
micro curies/cubic metre = 20 x 10^-3 Curies/cubic metre = 0.02
Curies/cubic metre
This number
represents the probability of personnel casualties with the symptoms of
the fourth stage from one charge if they were at a distance of 150 metres
from the centre of the explosion in these conditions. If we
wanted a 100 % probability then 33 bombs or approximately 2 radioactive
batches are needed. 5. External
exposure caused by surface contamination. Table
Nr 3 explains the distribution of the matter on the surface of the earth
(micro curies/cubic metre) under various atmospheric conditions when the
explosion is on the surface. The maximum
concentration at a distance of 150 metres from the centre of the explosion
is 40 thousand micro curies/cubic metre when conditions are settled and
wind speed is 1 m/sec in order that the following equation can be applied
for the dosage rate (roentgen/hour) at a distance of 1foot = 6 effectiveness
(Curie) x power (million electron volts) =6 x 40
x 10^3 x 10^-6 x 0.7 = 1780
x 10 If the
personnel remain for a period of 40 days then the dosage = 168
x 10^-3 x 40 x 24 = 12 x
10^6 square metres representing
(161.28/200) = 0.8064 The one
charge which will cause casualties of the fourth stage The bomb
is not the direct source of the radiation covering an area of ground,
it is the contamination of the surface and the food stuffs on and their
consumption which cause the internal damage 6. Activity required to cover an area of ground (external effects) In order
to calculate the activity required to cover a rectangle of ground with
an area of 12 square Km and to cause a dosage of external exposure which
would cause stage two casualties in table A, that is to say 25-100 Rem. Let
us assume that the dose for every square metre is 25 Rad. = 5.95
Curie for one hour Let us
assume that the duration of the stay is 40 days to cover
an area of 12 sq Km = 12 x 10^6 square metres We need
6 x 12 x 10^6 =72 x 10^6 milli curies but the
proportion which will be covered by the falling particles will be 1/16
of the total area this means
that we need (72/16) x 10^6 =4.5 x 10^6 milli curies When the
initial irradiation is 390 milli curie/Kgm and the secondary irraiation
is 1170 milli curie/Kgm 6 4 = 80.356
irradiation loads to inflict the required external effects. b. Another
example to calculate external exposure as a consequence of a radioactive
charge when measuring the rate of radioactive dosage resulting from a
charge with a reading of 25 Rad/hrs When we
assume that the source is a point - 30 Rad/hrs 30 x 24
x 40 = 2880 rad for the full dose Therefore
the number of doses which the charge will cause for this period of time
within the area of one square metre =
28800 = 144 times at fourth stage scale. When the
required area = 12 sq Km = 12 x 10^6 So the
number of charges =(12 x 10^6/144) =8.33 x 10^6 =8330 charges This requires
(8330/20) = 417 irradiation loads 7. The
relationship between concentrations in the air or on the surface with
the distances from the centre of the explosion in various atmospheric
conditions and at various altitudes. a. The
three explanatory drawings attached to table Nr A show the relationship
between the concentrations in the air (micro Curies/cubic metre) with
the distances from the point of explosion when at altitude zero from the
surface of the earth. It also shows the relationship {with} the three
atmospheric conditions (unsettled, moderate, settled) The greatest
concentrations occur at a distance of 200 metres from the point of the
explosion then fall off rapidly ever quicker as the distance increases.
The highest level of concentration permissable in the air for workers
in the radioactive fields is:- All the
calculations given in Table A are much more than this concentration. =3 x 10 = 20 times
the maximum amount allowed The concentration
of 0.6 micro curies per cubic metre referred to above is considererd to
be very slight. Now we
have a high concentration calculated to reach 20,000 micro curie/cubic
metre when conditions are settled and wind speed is averaging 2 m/sec
at a distance of 150 metres from the centre of the explosion on the surface
this means that the dosage equals (20,000/
2 x 10^-3) = 1x 10 more than the highest levels allowed
Graph Weather
- unsettlkd Graph Actual
altitude of source = 0 metre from surface of the earth Graph Weather
settled b. The
three explanatory graphs attached to to table nr 2 represent the relationship
between the concentration in the air (micro curies/cubic metre) and the
distance from the point of the explosion when it is at an altitude of
30 metres from the earth's suface and also shows the relationship of the
three types of atmospheric conditions (unsettled, moderate and settled) The highest
level of concentration is at a distance of 570 metres then decreases gradually. Table
Nr 2, distribution of concentration (micro curie/cubic mitre in the air
under various atmospheric conditions if actual altitude of clouds is 30
metres
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||